Iron is also highly reactive with other molecules, so the body keeps it locked up tight, bound to molecules that prevent it from wreaking havoc on the tissues.Īfter death, though, iron is let free from its cage. Iron is an element present in abundance in the body, particularly in the blood, where it is part of the protein that carries oxygen from the lungs to the tissues. 26) in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Schweitzer thinks she has the answer: Iron. The obvious question, though, was how soft, pliable tissue could survive for millions of years. "The problem is, for 300 years, we thought, 'Well, the organics are all gone, so why should we look for something that's not going to be there?' and nobody looks," she said. The researchers also analyzed other fossils for the presence of soft tissue, and found it was present in about half of their samples going back to the Jurassic Period, which lasted from 145.5 million to 199.6 million years ago, Schweitzer said. The tissue was collagen, they reported in the journal Science, and it shared similarities with bird collagen - which makes sense, as modern birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs such as T. They found the proteins really did come from dinosaur soft tissue. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.Then, in 2007, Schweitzer and her colleagues analyzed the chemistry of the T. Answers in Genesis is not responsible for content on the websites to which we refer. (Please note that links will take you directly to the source. Remember, if you see a news story that might merit some attention, let us know about it! (Note: if the story originates from the Associated Press, Fox News, MSNBC, the New York Times, or another major national media outlet, we will most likely have already heard about it.) And thanks to all of our readers who have submitted great news tips to us. rex soft tissue will receive, the discovery of intact soft tissue from a supposedly 68-million-year-old fossil is yet another strong indication that the old-age, evolutionary paradigm is flatly wrong. Ultimately, and despite the evolutionary interpretations the T. David Dewitt’s article: Tyrannosaurus rex: a big chicken? rex and chicken amino acid sequences.įor a more detailed look at this study, but from a creationist perspective, read Dr. rex and chickens, bolstering the idea that birds evolved from dinosaurs.” The “link,” according to the article, is “a remarkable similarity” between the T. Asara’s team examined the protein’s chemical structure and found it “showed an evolutionary link between T. Sequences? That’s just mind boggling how muchĪsara is quoted in a LiveScience article covering the latest news surrounding the “ancient” bones: the analysis of proteins extracted from them. I mean can you imagine pulling a bone out the groundĪfter 68 million years and then getting intact protein rather than admitting that the old-earth paradigm is flawed. Schweitzer and other paleontologists have fiercely held on to their old-age beliefs. As confirmation of scientists’ credulity regarding the evolutionary paradigm, note the recent comments of John Asara of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School: Incredibly, Schweitzer and other paleontologists have fiercely held on to their old-age beliefs, concluding that soft tissue must be able to survive such a long period, rather than admitting that the old-earth paradigm is flawed. rex fossil believed to be 68 million years old. It was news that rocked the world of paleontology two years ago: molecular paleontologist Mary Schweitzer and her colleagues reported the discovery of “soft, stretchy” tissue in a T.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |